Behavioral Intelligence — Emotional Reactive

You have real skill. But after a bad streak, a different trader takes over.

Based on 847 transactions across 2 accounts over 27 months. Every figure below is computed from your data — nothing is assumed.

ArchetypeEmotional Reactive

ConfidenceHIGH · 82%

Trades Analyzed847

Data Window27 months

Last Updated24 Mar 2026

Estimated Annual Pattern Tax

$34,200

Cost of behavioral mistakes across 847 trades

Disposition effect · selling winners early$14,800

Revenge trading · 6 sequences detected$9,400

Wash sales · 12 losses deferred$4,840

Premature exits near LTCG threshold$5,160

Full breakdown — 12 patterns

████████████

Unlock Full Analysis · $49/mo

Win Rate

43%

Population median: 49%

Avg Hold · Losers

31 days

vs 8 days on winners

Sizing Variance

CoV 1.42

Disciplined threshold: 0.50

Star Trade Dependency

67%

Of gains in top 3 trades

Behavioral patterns

Where the cost actually lives

Three views of the same weakness: the loss streak changes both your timing and your size.

Hold Duration — Winners vs Losers

Average days held per outcome bucket

Winners held 8 days avg

Losers held 31 days avg

Position Size Over Time

Oversizing spikes after losing sequences

Pattern tax driver — severity 9

After your 4-loss streak in March, your next position was $47,000 — 2.8× your average size. The edge did not disappear. Your behavior changed state. That shift alone likely costs $9,400 per year.

Cost · L3B-001

Your losers lived 3.9× longer than your winners

Winners were held 8 days on average. Losers were held 31. The asymmetry is not subtle — it is structural.

$14,800/yr847 trades

Tax · L3A-002

12 wash sales kept losses locked instead of realized

You re-entered names too quickly after loss exits, deferring tax value you thought you had captured.

$4,840 deferred12 events

Strength · L3B-016

Outside loss streaks, your sizing discipline is actually strong

When the emotional trigger is absent, your baseline variability drops into a healthy range. The problem is episodic, not permanent.

CoV 0.38 baseline

Trading DNA

8 behavioral dimensions

Each dimension is scored from trade evidence and adjusted by contextual rules.

Active vs Passive

passiveactive

68

Momentum vs Value

valuemomentum

72

Concentrated vs Diversified

diversifiedconcentrated

35

Disciplined vs Emotional

disciplinedemotional

78

Sophisticated vs Simple

simplesophisticated

42

Improving vs Declining

decliningimproving

44

Independent vs Herd

herdindependent

55

Risk Seeking vs Averse

averseseeking

61

Behavioral Intelligence — Premium Seller

Your options book has real edge. But when you sell matters more than what you sell.

Based on 312 options trades and 94 equity positions across 18 months. IV history adds context to every short-premium decision.

ArchetypePremium Seller

ConfidenceHIGH · 79%

Options Trades312

Win Rate67%

Defined Risk Book91%

Avg P&L · Low IV

-$340

IV rank below 0.30

Avg P&L · High IV

+$820

IV rank above 0.50

Profit Capture

34%

Target: 50% max profit

Theta Efficiency

61%

Benchmark: 70%+

Options execution analysis

The same structure performs differently depending on entry quality.

Your behavior is not random. It clusters around one recurring mistake: collecting premium when volatility is not paying you enough.

IV Rank at Entry vs Trade P&L

Low-volatility entries cluster below breakeven.

Low IV entries

High IV entries

Profit Capture Distribution

You routinely close before your own structure pays enough.

IV entry analysis · pattern tax driver

The difference between your low-IV entries and your high-IV entries is not cosmetic. It is $1,160 per trade. Same trader. Same structures. Different entry discipline.

Cost · L3D-001

31 short-premium entries were made when volatility was too cheap

Those trades underperformed the high-IV set dramatically. The issue is not your framework — it is when you deploy it.

$10,200/yr31 trades

Cost · L3D-003

You capture 34% of max profit when the process calls for 50%

Your exits are consistently early. That improves comfort, but it weakens expectancy.

$5,800/yr34% capture

Strength · L3C-013

91% of the book is defined-risk and structurally disciplined

The architecture of the strategy is solid. The timing inputs are where the leak lives.

91% defined-risk

Trading DNA

8 behavioral dimensions

Active vs Passive

passiveactive

58

Momentum vs Value

valuemomentum

62

Concentrated vs Diversified

diversifiedconcentrated

44

Disciplined vs Emotional

disciplinedemotional

38

Sophisticated vs Simple

simplesophisticated

81

Improving vs Declining

decliningimproving

62

Independent vs Herd

herdindependent

67

Risk Seeking vs Averse

averseseeking

42

Behavioral Intelligence — Concentrated Accumulator

You build positions like an institution. Your edge is patience — and one question the data cannot answer alone.

Based on 247 transactions across 3 accounts over 50 months. This profile is less about behavioral cost and more about structural concentration and conviction.

ArchetypeConcentrated Accumulator

ConfidenceMEDIUM · 74%

Avg Hold Period847 days

Win Rate61%

Turnover PercentileBottom 8%

Profile mode

DNA Mode — your discipline is the insight

There is no large pattern tax headline here. The interesting question is how concentration was built and whether that concentration was thesis-driven or accidental.

Top 3 Positions

84%

of realized gains

Avg Entries / Top Position

5.2

Systematic scaling

Effective Positions

4

Despite 14 holdings

Unified Tech Exposure

61%

vs 34% per-account

Behavioral strengths + open questions

The data shows unusual patience. It still needs your context.

Portfolio Allocation — Capital Distribution

Four effective positions despite a larger headline holding count.

Win Rate by Hold Duration

Your edge increases materially with patience.

Open question — requires your context

Your top position accounts for 71% of realized gains. The data shows you built it patiently over 6 entries in 14 months. It does not show the thesis. That part still needs you.

Strength · L3B-024

You scale into conviction instead of forcing a full-size first entry

Across major winners, the average entry price improved materially through tranche discipline.

5.2 avg entries-12% avg cost

Strength · L3B-015

Your edge compounds with duration, not frequency

Positions held longer than a year materially outperform the short-duration bucket.

847 days avgBottom 8% turnover

Structural · L3C-004

Cross-account aggregation reveals concentration hidden in plain sight

Viewed together, technology exposure is nearly double what any single account implies.

61% unified34% per-account

Trading DNA

6 active dimensions — 2 need more data

This investor profile is structurally strong, but some dimensions require option or timing evidence to fully resolve.

Active vs Passive

passiveactive

22

Momentum vs Value

valuemomentum

31

Concentrated vs Diversified

diversifiedconcentrated

74

Disciplined vs Emotional

disciplinedemotional

28

Sophisticated vs Simple

simplesophisticated

—

Improving vs Declining

decliningimproving

68

Independent vs Herd

herdindependent

—

Risk Seeking vs Averse

averseseeking

58